Escola de Pacientes logo Escola de Pacientes

Feedback from former members

Ongoing evaluation of the experience of taking part in the Escola de Pacientes research group.

Escola de Pacientes uses evaluation cycles to improve guidance, work organization, and scientific training opportunities. The data presented are anonymized and aggregated solely for transparency and to improve how the group works.

In summary

9former members evaluated
89%gave the top score
4,9 / 5average rating

Experience evaluation

Responses concentrated at the top of the scale.

  • Top score89%
  • Other scores11%
Main reason for leavingBalancing with academic activities

Leaving is associated with reconciling the academic schedule, not with an overall assessment of the experience.

Observed trends

Very positive experience

Average of 4.9 out of 5 and 89% top scores.

Mentoring and opportunities go together

Guidance, organization, and scientific opportunities appear in the highest band of the summary.

Staying depends on academic workload

The main reason for leaving was the difficulty of balancing the group with other activities.

Strengths identified

Qualitative summary of mentions — the levels do not represent percentages.

  • Guidance and mentoringHigh
  • Organization and planningHigh
  • Scientific opportunitiesHigh
  • Collaborative workModerate

Opportunities for improvement

  • Reduce the excess of messages
  • Make tasks more objective
  • Improve the assignment of responsibilities
  • Create follow-up flows

Improvement cycle

  1. 1Participant feedback
  2. 2Analysis of the anonymized data
  3. 3Adjustments to how the group works
  4. 4New evaluation

How these results were prepared

Aggregated summary of an evaluation carried out with former members of the research group. Names, emails, dates, and response times are not part of this file. Verbatim testimonials are presented at the end, without personal attribution, only as illustrative examples.

Summary updated on 2026-08-30.

What this data is, and what it is not

This page presents an aggregated summary of the evaluation by former members of the research group. It does not include evaluations by students who took part in clinical simulations — that data is on the Simulations in numbers page.

Names, emails, dates, and response times are not published. The open file contains only the summary used on this page.

How the results are used

Strengths guide the preservation of what works. Opportunities for improvement are turned into adjustments in organization, communication, and follow-up, followed by a new round of evaluation.

How to cite and reuse

The aggregated data on this page may be reused with attribution to Escola de Pacientes (UnB).

Escola de Pacientes. *Feedback de ex-integrantes*. Brasília: UnB, 2026. Disponível em escoladepacientes.com/feedback-ex-integrantes.

Illustrative testimonials

Verbatim excerpts presented without personal attribution, only as a qualitative illustration of the results.

“The guidance was essential for getting started in scientific writing.”

“I got my first international publication.”

“The group offers many opportunities for those who are just starting out.”

QR code that opens this page
Point your camera to open this page